Amalgamated Union of Kenya Metal Workers v Essential Management Consultancy Services Limited [2020] eKLR Case Summary

Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Category
Civil
Judge(s)
Hon. Justice Byram Ongaya
Judgment Date
October 23, 2020
Country
Kenya
Document Type
PDF
Number of Pages
3

Case Brief: Amalgamated Union of Kenya Metal Workers v Essential Management Consultancy Services Limited [2020] eKLR


1. Case Information:
- Name of the Case: Amalgamated Union of Kenya Metal Workers v. Essential Management Consultancy Services Limited
- Case Number: Cause No. 1160 of 2018
- Court: Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya at Nairobi
- Date Delivered: 23rd October 2020
- Category of Law: Civil
- Judge(s): Hon. Justice Byram Ongaya
- Country: Kenya

2. Questions Presented:
The central legal issues before the court include:
- Whether the respondent's actions in locking out employees without prior notification constituted a violation of Article 41(1) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010.
- Whether the court should compel the respondent to adhere to the agreement signed before the Central Organization of Trade Unions (COTU).

3. Facts of the Case:
The claimant, Amalgamated Union of Kenya Metal Workers, is a registered trade union representing 95 employees of Essential Management Consultancy Services Limited, the respondent. The employees were locked out on June 28, 2018, after they voluntarily joined the union, which the respondent refused to recognize. The claimant alleged that the lockout was unjustified and contravened their rights under the Constitution. Prior to the lockout, an agreement was reached on June 21, 2018, between the parties, which included terms regarding relocation and employee treatment.

4. Procedural History:
The claimant filed a memorandum of claim on July 9, 2018, seeking remedies for the alleged unlawful lockout and enforcement of the agreement with COTU. The respondent replied on August 17, 2018, denying the allegations and claiming that the employees' contracts had expired, and that the lockout was a consequence of the employees' refusal to relocate. The case progressed through submissions from both parties, leading to the court's determination on the remedies to be issued.

5. Analysis:
- Rules: The court considered Article 41(1) of the Constitution of Kenya, which guarantees the right to fair labor practices, and the binding nature of agreements reached between employers and employees.
- Case Law: The court did not explicitly cite previous cases, but the principles of labor relations and the enforceability of agreements in employment contexts were implied in its reasoning.
- Application: The court found that the respondent had not contested the validity of the agreement signed before COTU. Since both parties acknowledged this agreement, the court ruled that it was binding and that the respondent must comply with its terms. The court also noted that the agreement resolved the dispute regarding the lockout, thus limiting further investigation into the circumstances of the lockout itself.

6. Conclusion:
The court ruled in favor of the claimant, declaring the agreement reached before COTU as binding and ordering the respondent to adhere to its terms. Additionally, the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant's costs of the suit. This ruling underscores the importance of honoring agreements in labor relations and reinforces workers' rights to union representation.

7. Dissent:
There were no dissenting opinions noted in the judgment.

8. Summary:
The Employment and Labour Relations Court ruled in favor of the Amalgamated Union of Kenya Metal Workers, affirming the binding nature of the agreement reached with Essential Management Consultancy Services Limited. The ruling highlights the court's commitment to upholding labor rights and the enforceability of agreements within employment contexts, emphasizing the protection afforded to employees in Kenya under constitutional law.

Document Summary

Below is the summary preview of this document.

  • Amalgamated-Union-of-Kenya-Metal-Workers-v-Essential-Management-Consultancy-Services-Limited-[2020]-eKLR-Case-Summary_2515_0.jpg

This is the end of the summary preview.

Related Documents

View all summaries